kr.1.33M
Equity net of selling costs
Compare buying a home with renting and investing the difference. The model includes mortgage costs, ownership costs, home equity, down payment opportunity cost, and the renter's investment portfolio.
Buying
Renting
Shared Assumptions
Renting builds kr.364,781 more wealth
Under these assumptions, renting and investing the difference leaves the renter ahead after 10 years.
Buying does not pull ahead within 40 years under these assumptionskr.1.33M
Equity net of selling costs
kr.1.69M
Portfolio value
Never (40yr)
When buying pulls ahead
kr.15,116/mo
All-in year 1
kr.11,167/mo
All-in year 1
kr.3.31M
Appreciated value
Buyer equity net of selling costs versus the renter portfolio built from the down payment and invested monthly savings.
The down payment is not free. This shows what that capital and the monthly savings gap could be worth if invested instead.
Key checkpoints showing net worth for both paths and the running gap between them.
| Year | Buyer Net Worth | Renter Net Worth | Difference | Home Value | Mortgage Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | kr.502,616 | kr.692,319 | -kr.189,704 | kr.3.03M | kr.2.35M |
| Year 3 | kr.672,858 | kr.886,907 | -kr.214,048 | kr.3.09M | kr.2.23M |
| Year 5 | kr.850,039 | kr.1.1M | -kr.245,769 | kr.3.15M | kr.2.11M |
| Year 10 | kr.1.33M | kr.1.69M | -kr.364,781 | kr.3.31M | kr.1.79M |
Buying costs kr.3,950 more per month in year 1. That gap, invested consistently, is worth kr.484,464 after 10 years. The crossover year - when buying's equity buildup overtakes the renter's invested portfolio - is beyond the 40-year model horizon under current assumptions. Results are shown in nominal money.
Understand how buying and renting compare as modeled wealth paths, and which assumptions can change the outcome.
This calculator compares two wealth paths:
The result is not saying that one lifestyle is better. It shows which path produces higher modeled net worth under the assumptions above.
Buying often looks worse over short periods because transaction costs and selling costs have less time to spread out. Longer stays can give equity and appreciation more time to matter.
A down payment is not free. If you buy, that capital goes into the home. If you rent, the model assumes that money is invested instead.
The comparison depends heavily on what happens to the monthly difference between buying and renting. If the renter does not invest the difference, the renting path will usually look too optimistic.
A small change in appreciation can move the result significantly. Test conservative assumptions, especially if prices have recently risen quickly.
Maintenance, insurance, taxes, and selling costs can change the result more than expected. Leaving these too low can make buying look artificially strong.
Run three versions:
Then change the time horizon. Rent vs. buy decisions often reverse when the holding period changes.
Want the formulas and assumptions?
No. Buying can build wealth, but it also has transaction costs, maintenance costs, and opportunity cost. The result depends on assumptions and time horizon.
Because the down payment is capital. A fair comparison asks what that money could do if it were not used to buy the home.
It is the first year when the buying path overtakes the renting path in modeled net worth.
Treat it as a planning signal, not a verdict. Small changes in appreciation, rent growth, maintenance, or investment return can change the answer.
No. Stability, flexibility, moving plans, schools, commute, and personal preference are outside the model.
Change the time horizon, home appreciation, maintenance costs, and investment return. Those usually move the result most.